|

Does New Thought Walk its Talk with COVID Precautions?

Spread the love

BY REBECCA HARMON

In times of trouble, religious and spiritual people often turn to their leaders for guidance, support, and comfort. What happens if/when those leaders abdicate their sacred responsibilities? Back in 2020 as the novel Coronavirus began to wreak havoc on everyday American lives, I remember too many responses that hinted at deep problems in a movement that I had been struggling to understand for a few years: organized spiritual metaphysics.

Since 2012 when I first stumbled into a metaphysical center/church, I have experienced equal parts joy and sorrow. In many ways, the period in my life from 2012 through today has been a journey of reconciling those extremes to find my place within the philosophy as well as a peace about it.

In the Spring of 2020, the world had more questions than answers about the Coronavirus, and it seemed that guessing wrong – especially in spiritual communities which tend to be older – had lethal consequences. For me this meant that the only reasonable option was to take maximum precautions.

Photo by Marisol Benitez, Unsplash

If we overshoot the precautions, we can come back together after it’s over and all have a good laugh at how paranoid we had been. The alternative – to keep gathering and not worry about it – seemed risky, dangerous, and out of alignment with the principle of Oneness (a principle hailed within New Thought as a core tenet).

Public health and the offering plate

My first go-round with a minister about the tension between public health and the offering plate was in March of 2020 after I emailed my friends who attended the local church and the minister. I suggested they consider suspending in-person services and classes for a while. ALL of these women are well into their 60’s and 70’s and the church was a small, poorly ventilated space.

Many agreed with me, but what happened next would turn out to be foreshadowing of behavior that I would see again and again. I received a response from the minister that began with “Thank you for your concern. And we still have an active community that needs your weekly financial support. Please consider making regular contributions through PayPal.”

Offerings, tithes, financial gifts – these were the FIRST concern.

Although I knew better, for a moment I hoped that this was one misguided person, and not representative of the larger movement. More than 18-months later I wish I could report that I see less evidence of that perspective.

In a recent social media post, I asked if the group (a private group focused on discussions around spiritual metaphysics) thought that ministers should be required to disclose their vaccination status. The responses were fascinating.

Illness is not possible

Several people indicated that this was indeed a good idea, but more people than I had hoped ALSO indicated that it should not be required. Private channel communications (e.g. not on social media) began to flow into my inbox. I watched as ministers and Practitioners posted that they should not have to report their vaccination status for many reasons, including because illness is not possible in an individualization of God and disease is not a spiritual idea in the Mind of God (a perspective I refer to as “fundamentalist religious science”).

At the same time, I began to hear stories of ministers (open anti-vaxxers) who are flouting local public health recommendations around masking, refusing to disclose their vaccination status – sometimes hiding behind privacy concerns – all while continuing “business-as-usual” on Sunday mornings, which includes hugging people and talking in close proximity to others.

I’m going to pause here to note that as of September 18, 2021, 672,689 American have died due to COVID-19.

How can an organization reconcile a goal of working to make the world work for everyone with actions like these among their recognized leaders at a time when so many have died from this virus?

A world that would work for everyone demands TRANSPARENCY in the face of real risks. People who attend a Sunday service, workshop, seminar, class, or meeting should be able to make that decision based on full disclosure of the information around risks to themselves and their families.

I am not suggesting that ministers be required to get vaccinated or lose their licenses (although I will pause here and point out that many Practitioners have lost licenses for MUCH LESS). I am suggesting that leaders in an organization that promotes itself as having the answers for how to create a world that works for everyone are acting in a way that is completely OPPOSITE that goal.

Sensible precautions

The world isn’t working for everyone if people can’t attend a Sunday service and have a reasonable assurance that every sensible public health precaution is being taken to keep them safe – including having the information they need to decide if it’s in their best interest to expose themselves to the group.

The world isn’t working for everyone when ONENESS is a marketing phrase but not an actual practice.

When it comes to this virus, ONENESS is an appropriate theme. We are all in this together. The virus does not discriminate. If an organization wants to promote itself as an organization that is the embodiment of Oneness their actions – not just their marketing – need to reflect it.

Oneness in the face of a global pandemic means that everyone – especially LEADERS – are open, honest, and transparent around their vaccine status. It means that leaders and local churches/centers not only implement but support in every way the local public health guidelines such as masking, social distancing and more.

It ALSO means that while some may believe that if their consciousness is in the “right place”, they cannot get sick, they understand that not everyone else is in that same place. Therefore, they act in ways that show care, love, and respect for all by behaving in ways that will keep EVERYONE safe – regardless of “consciousness”.

Hard decisions

Promoting an organization as “expert” in creating a world that works for every person requires hard decisions from the top.  I would like to see more direct and relevant guidance from the same office that is busy printing rules for Practitioners on social media posts around this MUCH MORE IMPORTANT issue.

I’ll even make this easy for them by writing their draft copy:

For immediate dissemination:

Being a spiritual leader during a pandemic requires that you lead by example. Effective immediately all credentialed leaders in are expected to abide by the following:

  • Wear a mask and require it, as recommended by your local public health agencies, for Sunday services, classes, meetings and more;
  • Get vaccinated. If you have strong personal beliefs (or are ineligible) – make sure you’re transparent with EVERYONE so people coming to you/your center can make the best choice for themselves and their families;
  • Support in word and action the behaviors that MODEL our commitment to making the world work best for all.

In doing this we demonstrate the Oneness that we promote/teach by acting in a way that is truly respectful of all.

In the medical center and university where I work, employees who refuse to disclose their vaccine status or get a vaccine are at risk of losing their jobs, health insurance, and other benefits.

While I do not anticipate any bravery from the top ranks of the larger metaphysical organizations, I do have hope that the many people I see expressing concern and regard for others will exercise their rights to do what they can to force compliance: withhold their tithes, offerings and gifts from churches/centers and ministers that show a willful disregard for public health and a lack of care and concern for the people that they expect to support them.

We will get through this pandemic and find a new normal on the other side. Whether today’s spiritual organizations survive to have a chance in that new normal will rest largely on their ability to truly understand what it means to make that world that indeed works for all.

Rebecca Harmon is a healthcare professional, college educator, writer and popular speaker in her professional field. In 2019 she earned a credential as a licensed spiritual Practitioner but has decided not to renew those credentials due to concerns of integrity within the larger movement.

“I don’t shop at Hobby Lobby or eat at Chick-Fil A. For the same reasons, I will not be providing any support – financial, intellectual property or other – to an organization that acts in conflict to principles that I hold as important.”  ~ Rebecca Harmon

Rebecca writes regularly about her spiritual journey. You can find more from her about that journey on her blog: Practitioner’s Path.

 

Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. My Religious Science teacher used to say, “Don’t judge Religious Science by religious scientists.” The movement toward various kinds of magical thinking (thinking that is neither spiritually-based nor reality-based) has been a growing trend in New Thought for some time now. I have blogged about it often (see my website below).

    When you combine a tendency toward magical thinking with a mistaken sense of absolute individuality (as if that could be the case in a teaching about Oneness). you all too often get the kind of misinformed and tragic positions such as those who are anti-vaccine in the movement. When such people are in positions of leadership, their misguided ways an affect others who depend on them for spiritual guidance and trust what they preach.

    This is not to say that there is a problem with the teaching or its principles. The problem lies in those who follow the teaching in a shallow fashion, and, of course, those who are misled by spiritual teachers whose knowledge of the teaching is inadequate.

    I have also done a few blog posts on the lack of rigor in the selection and training of practitioners and ministers – and on the lack of ongoing evaluations which ensure that members of our ministries are not subjected to those who have no business being credentialed. While no system is perfect, our New Thought organizations have been spectacularly lax in developing and enforcing high standards for those seeking to be credentialed in positions of spiritual leadership.

    So, sadly, it falls upon each individual to evaluate what spiritual leaders are saying and doing with respect to the COVID Pandemic, vaccines, medical treatments, and the application of spiritual principles thereto. Not an ideal state of affairs.

    1. Thank you, Jim, for your comments and contribution to the topic at hand.

      As a relative newcomer to the teachings, I can only imagine the deep sadness among those with much longer tenure in the movement, as these issues are not only left unaddressed, but actively swept under the nearest carpet.

      Like you, I know that the problem lies not within the core principles, but in their interpretation and application by those whose guiding stars point to their own power, prosperity and prominence.

      For a few years I had hope as leadership shifted and people were moved in and out of key positions. Alas, the non-ideal state of affairs continued, and in many ways has worsened.

      I have no doubt that the principles and basic teaching will survive. I’m not sure that the organizations dedicated to teaching them will, and given all I’ve seen – maybe it’s best if they don’t.

      Rebecca

  2. Good morning Rebecca,
    First let me say I appreciate your willingness to call into question the directions that New Thought is taking. This is a time that we need to be questioning our motives and continuing to balance our teachings with what is happening in the world. I may take issue with much of the way you interpret New Thought teachings, but that is the blessing these teachings give us… freedom to relate them to our personal experience and personal spiritual journey.

    That being said, the foundational point of your post (as I see it) is not about New Thought beliefs or teachings but in fact a personal opinion and belief that unvaccinated people are more contagious and dangerous to be around than vaccinated. It also appears that you assume the reader agrees with you on this belief, as you carry this assumption throughout your post without ever addressing it.

    If you are comfortable with it, would you please share with us here what scientific data or studies you have based this belief on, so that the rest of us can decide if we do in fact agree with it or not? I have not seen anything that supports this conclusion, but am I always open to the latest data.

    Thank you,
    Rev. Shad

    1. There is ample scientific data around the risks that unvaccinated people pose, including:

      This article in the Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/the-vaccinated-arent-just-as-likely-to-spread-covid/620161/)

      This article at USAToday: (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/08/11/covid-transmission-among-vaccinated-unvaccinated-what-experts-say/5488398001/)

      This article at Bloomberg News: (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-09-05/the-unvaccinated-are-a-risk-to-all-of-us)

      Lastly, this from the CDC:

      Unvaccinated people remain the greatest concern: The greatest risk of transmission is among unvaccinated people who are much more likely to get infected, and therefore transmit the virus. Fully vaccinated people get COVID-19 (known as breakthrough infections) less often than unvaccinated people. People infected with the Delta variant, including fully vaccinated people with symptomatic breakthrough infections, can transmit the virus to others. CDC is continuing to assess data on whether fully vaccinated people with asymptomatic breakthrough infections can transmit the virus.

      Fully vaccinated people with Delta variant breakthrough infections can spread the virus to others. However, vaccinated people appear to spread the virus for a shorter time: For prior variants, lower amounts of viral genetic material were found in samples taken from fully vaccinated people who had breakthrough infections than from unvaccinated people with COVID-19. For people infected with the Delta variant, similar amounts of viral genetic material have been found among both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated people. However, like prior variants, the amount of viral genetic material may go down faster in fully vaccinated people when compared to unvaccinated people. This means fully vaccinated people will likely spread the virus for less time than unvaccinated people.

      If you haven’t seen any of this data/these reports, you haven’t been looking very hard,…

    2. Hi, Rev. Shad,
      I’ll respond now because I do not want COVID misinformation to stand unchallenged on my blog, and you are, in the guise of asking a question, spreading COVID misinformation. (Rebecca may choose, or not choose, to respond with something additional).
      Where to begin? It also seems disingenuous, an pre-determined argument posing as a question that clothes anti-vax rhetoric in what I would term an indirect New Thought soft-speak. I would invite you, given your high-level position, and responsibility for the safety of Unity adherents in Colorado and internationally, as an executive director of the Unity executive council, to stay abreast of the latest thinking, from, for instance, the CDC which I link below in addition to a Kaiser Foundation analysis. Those sources indicate breakthrough infections in vaccinated people are comparatively rare and unvaccinated people account for the great majority of infections. Since a vaccinated person would need to acquire a breakthrough case it’s a simple deduction to see that vaccinated people pose less of a risk than the unvaccinated. Some data also suggests that the vaccinated, assuming a breakthrough case, are contagious for 3 days versus about 10 days for the unvaccinated. It also appears Unity hasn’t updated its COVID guidance since March 2020 and there is nothing current to inform adherents broadly or at the Boulder church what is being done so they are as safe as possible. If I missed something on the Unity site, please point it out.
      _Harv Bishop
      Links follow:
      https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-variant.html
      https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/covid-19-vaccine-breakthrough-cases-data-from-the-states/

        1. I am a Unity minister who is fully vaccinated and have had the booster. I live in Alameda County in Northern California. Every Sunday during our livestream service I mention that I am vaccinated and that we are social distancing, wearing masks and washing hands. We provide CDC information in addition to housing info and info on how to support Afghani refugees. I’m grateful to live in an area where 99.9% of the people where masks and believe in our doctors and scientists.

          1. That is good to hear Diana! I hope that becomes a model for model New Thought churches. Some churches in Religious Science have done similar. Some have not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *